← Air events

Fireworks Possible

2019-12-31 to 2020-01-01 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX fireworks episode

December 31, 2019 to January 1, 2020

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 110.6 µg/m³ near Houston across 1 covered metro home to 7.8 million people. 1 metro recorded their worst day on record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 6.0 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 47 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Fireworks”

Exact-night Houston community posts and radar discussion identify widespread fireworks smoke. No agency attribution was recovered, so confidence remains possible.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

Inference, not direct attribution

Holiday timing: The event falls in the July 3–5 or December 31–January 1 fireworks window. That makes fireworks a reasonable hypothesis, but no retained source directly attributes this event.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Fireworks

    Houston residents documented widespread fireworks and smoke during the exact New Year's Eve window.

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    110.6 µg/m³ near Houston

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 5.0 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX

Monitor comparison window 2019-12-28 to 2020-01-04 · PM2.5 target: Houston Aldine

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 32.9 µg/m³

369% above nearby days

Air movement 2.86 kt

19% lower than surrounding days

Carbon monoxide 0.404 ppm

29% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 32.9 µg/m³

369% higher than surrounding days

Before4 µg/m³ Event32.9 µg/m³ After7.53 µg/m³
5 monitors · 1 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 0.404 ppm

29% higher than surrounding days

Before0.162 ppm Event0.404 ppm After0.314 ppm
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 16.8 ppb

46% higher than surrounding days

Before4.13 ppb Event16.8 ppb After10.7 ppb
17 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 0.429 ppb

580% higher than surrounding days

Before0.015 ppb Event0.429 ppb After0.048 ppb
6 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.023 ppm

10% higher than surrounding days

Before0.024 ppm Event0.023 ppm After0.018 ppm
20 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 37 °F

23% lower than surrounding days

Pressure 1020 Millibars

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 53.2 °F

8% lower than surrounding days

Wind 2.86 kt

19% lower than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 110.6 µg/m³ 7.1 Jan 1, 2020 Worst day on record

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

4 retained sources

Community report

At least there's one upside to Houston being so flat: NYE fireworks from Grand Parkway in Katy

Reddit r/houston

A public, exact-date community post presents a local photograph of New Year's fireworks viewed from the Grand Parkway in Katy within the Houston metro.

What it supports

Fireworks activity occurred in the event geography and time window.

Limit

One community post establishes local fireworks occurrence only. It does not establish the source of the regional PM2.5 measurement or the scale of emissions.

Community report

So many fireworks were set off at midnight NYE that NWS Houston radar easily detects the smoke

Reddit r/houston

A public, exact-date Houston community post links the midnight fireworks activity to a shared NWS Houston radar image described as detecting the resulting smoke.

What it supports

Fireworks activity occurred in the event geography and time window.

Limit

This is a community report and indirect radar interpretation, not an independently retained official meteorological or causal assessment.

Community report

New Year's Eve fireworks visible on radar

Reddit / r/Houston

Houston residents documented widespread fireworks and smoke during the exact New Year's Eve window.

What it supports

A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Transparent inference

Holiday timing pattern

IAQng deterministic inference policy

The event peak falls on 2019-12-31 and the event lasts no more than two days. Under holiday_fireworks_possible.v1, that timing is consistent with a possible fireworks contribution.

What it supports

A possible fireworks contribution; this is a reproducible inference, not direct occurrence or causal evidence.

Limit

Pre-event and post-event temporal-shape data were not supplied.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.