← Air events

Fireworks Likely

2019-01-01 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX fireworks episode

January 1, 2019

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 47.7 µg/m³ near San Antonio across 1 covered metro home to 2.8 million people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.8 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 4.9 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Fireworks”

Contemporaneous local reporting ties San Antonio's January 1 PM2.5 spike and unhealthy AQI directly to widespread New Year's fireworks, while explicitly retaining fog and weak dispersion as contributing uncertainty.

Likely Applicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.

San Antonio Express-News · Jan 4, 2019 corroborates

New Year's fireworks in San Antonio made the air bad to breathe

The report says widespread New Year's fireworks drove San Antonio's particulate AQI into the unhealthy category, documents thousands of fireworks complaints, and notes that light winds and fog limited dispersion of the smoke.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Fireworks

    The report says widespread New Year's fireworks drove San Antonio's particulate AQI into the unhealthy category, documents thousands of fireworks complaints, and notes that light winds and fog limited dispersion of the smoke.

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    47.7 µg/m³ near San Antonio

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.2 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX

Monitor comparison window 2018-12-29 to 2019-01-04 · PM2.5 target: Palo Alto

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 27.4 µg/m³

366% above nearby days

Air movement 6.79 kt

43% higher than surrounding days

Carbon monoxide 0.429 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 27.4 µg/m³

366% higher than surrounding days

Before8.96 µg/m³ Event27.4 µg/m³ After5.79 µg/m³
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 0.429 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.279 ppm Event0.429 ppm After0.500 ppm
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 3.89 ppb

14% lower than surrounding days

Before4.51 ppb Event3.89 ppb After10.2 ppb
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 0.317 ppb

124% higher than surrounding days

Before0.025 ppb Event0.317 ppb After0.196 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.016 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.014 ppm Event0.016 ppm After0.015 ppm
3 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Temperature 44.8 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Wind 6.79 kt

43% higher than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 47.7 µg/m³ 2.2 Jan 1, 2019 #7 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

1 retained source

News report

New Year's fireworks in San Antonio made the air bad to breathe

San Antonio Express-News

The report says widespread New Year's fireworks drove San Antonio's particulate AQI into the unhealthy category, documents thousands of fireworks complaints, and notes that light winds and fog limited dispersion of the smoke.

What it supports

A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Limit

The report cautions that the exact shares of fireworks smoke and fog-related visibility effects were not separately quantified.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Likely Applicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.