kwqc.com · Jul 5, 2017 corroborates
Fireworks Possible
2017-07-04 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA fireworks episode
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 49.5 µg/m³ near Des Moines across 1 covered metro home to 753,913 people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.9 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 1.4 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Fireworks”
The one-day Des Moines event falls exactly on July 4 and the versioned holiday-fireworks rule applies. Iowa DNR separately recognizes fireworks as a recurring PM source, but no 2017 city-specific assessment was found.
Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
kcrg.com · Jul 5, 2017 corroborates
I9: Fireworks smoke creating air quality issue
CBS 2 Iowa · Invalid Date hypothesis
EPA: Fireworks caused temporary decrease in air quality in Iowa
The archived result title explicitly attributes the contemporaneous Iowa air-quality decrease to fireworks. The page could not be opened in this pass, so the claim remains unassessed rather than verified from article text.
Inference, not direct attribution
Holiday timing: The event falls in the July 3–5 or December 31–January 1 fireworks window. That makes fireworks a reasonable hypothesis, but no retained source directly attributes this event.
Evidence path
From source to city
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.
- 1Documented
Source or mechanism
Fireworks
The archived result title explicitly attributes the contemporaneous Iowa air-quality decrease to fireworks. The page could not be opened in this pass, so the claim remains unassessed rather than verified from article text.
View supporting source ↗ - 2Research gap
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
- 3Documented
Local response
49.5 µg/m³ near Des Moines
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.3 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
Event autopsy
What the instruments saw
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.
Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA
Monitor comparison window 2017-07-01 to 2017-07-07 · PM2.5 target: CARPENTER
381% above nearby days
15% lower than surrounding days
15% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors PM2.5 46.2 µg/m³
381% higher than surrounding days
Before7 µg/m³ Event46.2 µg/m³ After9.60 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide 0.242 ppm
15% higher than surrounding days
Before0.209 ppm Event0.242 ppm After0.165 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide 7.45 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before7.17 ppb Event7.45 ppb After3.43 ppb
Sulfur dioxide 0.083 ppb
849% higher than surrounding days
Before0 ppb Event0.083 ppb After0.017 ppb
Ozone 0.025 ppm
22% lower than surrounding days
Before0.033 ppm Event0.025 ppm After0.040 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations17% higher than surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
15% lower than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
-- cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Affected metros
| Metro | Peak PM2.5 | Cigarettes, whole event | Peak day | All-time standing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA | 49.5 µg/m³ | 2.3 | Jul 4, 2017 | #8 of its top days |
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
Holiday timing pattern
IAQng deterministic inference policy
The event peak falls on 2017-07-04 and the event lasts no more than two days. Under holiday_fireworks_possible.v1, that timing is consistent with a possible fireworks contribution.
What it supports
A possible fireworks contribution; this is a reproducible inference, not direct occurrence or causal evidence.
Limit
Pre-event and post-event temporal-shape data were not supplied.
What remains uncertain
- The retained evidence is scoped to the places and dates stated; it is not a catalog promotion.
Status and provenance
Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.