Daily PM2.5 peaked at 72.2 µg/m³ near Ogden across
1 covered metro home to 667,681 people.
1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.9 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 2.0 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Fireworks”
The event falls on a major fireworks holiday; no exact local causal assessment was recovered.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
A contemporaneous Utah meteorology blog reported post-midnight PM2.5 spikes and described fireworks displays in Ogden, but characterized the link only as possible evidence rather than a formal attribution.
Inference, not direct attribution
Holiday timing: The event falls in the July 3–5 or December 31–January 1 fireworks window. That makes fireworks a reasonable hypothesis, but no retained source directly attributes this event.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
A contemporaneous Utah meteorology blog reported post-midnight PM2.5 spikes and described fireworks displays in Ogden, but characterized the link only as possible evidence rather than a formal attribution.
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
72.2 µg/m³ near Ogden
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 3.3 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Ogden-Clearfield, UT
Monitor comparison window 2013-12-29 to 2014-01-04 · PM2.5 target: Ogden
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse67.6 µg/m³
70% above nearby days
Air movement231 Degrees Compass
12% lower than surrounding days
PM1081 µg/m³
40% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.567.6 µg/m³
70% higher than surrounding days
Before39.8 µg/m³ Event67.6 µg/m³ After35.8 µg/m³
PM1081 µg/m³
40% higher than surrounding days
Before58 µg/m³ Event81 µg/m³ After47 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.39 ppm
24% higher than surrounding days
Before1.08 ppm Event1.39 ppm After1.48 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide36.9 ppb
8% lower than surrounding days
Before43.8 ppb Event36.9 ppb After40 ppb
Ozone0.012 ppm
53% higher than surrounding days
Before0.006 ppm Event0.012 ppm After0.008 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity77.8 %
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure874 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature29.8 °F
12% higher than surrounding days
Wind231 Degrees Compass
12% lower than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
Transparent inference
Holiday timing pattern
IAQng deterministic inference policy
The event peak falls on 2014-01-01 and the event lasts no more than two days. Under holiday_fireworks_possible.v1, that timing is consistent with a possible fireworks contribution.
What it supports
A possible fireworks contribution; this is a reproducible inference, not direct occurrence or causal evidence.
Limit
Pre-event and post-event temporal-shape data were not supplied.
What remains uncertain
The classification is bounded to the retained evidence and does not apportion every source contributing to the daily PM2.5 value.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.