← Air events

Fireworks Officially verified

2001-01-01 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA fireworks episode

January 1, 2001

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 80 µg/m³ near San Jose across 1 covered metro home to 2.0 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 3.2 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 6.5 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Fireworks”

A Bay Area Air Quality Management District staff report explicitly labels January 1, 2001 as a fireworks-caused Top 20 Bay Area PM2.5 day. CARB's same-season San Jose source-apportionment summary remains useful context but is not the basis for the exact-date cause.

Officially verified A directly applicable government determination or qualified scientific attribution product identifies this cause.

California Air Resources Board corroborates

The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality

CARB's source-apportionment summary for San Jose peak PM2.5 samples collected during December 2000-January 2001 identifies a mixture dominated by motor-vehicle emissions, ammonium nitrate, and wood or plant burning.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Fireworks

    The Air District's official Top 20 chart identifies the Bay Area PM2.5 peak on January 1, 2001 as caused by fireworks.

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    80 µg/m³ near San Jose

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 3.6 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA

Monitor comparison window 2000-12-29 to 2001-01-04 · PM2.5 target: San Jose - 4th St.

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 78.5 µg/m³

35% above nearby days

Air movement 3.52 kt

About the same as surrounding days

PM10 75 µg/m³

No adjacent-day comparison

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 78.5 µg/m³

35% higher than surrounding days

Before58 µg/m³ Event78.5 µg/m³ After56.7 µg/m³
2 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 75 µg/m³

No adjacent-day comparison

Before Event75 µg/m³ After
3 monitors · 24 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 2.14 ppm

31% lower than surrounding days

Before2.69 ppm Event2.14 ppm After3.22 ppm
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 37 ppb

24% lower than surrounding days

Before45.3 ppb Event37 ppb After56.1 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.024 ppm

40% higher than surrounding days

Before0.012 ppm Event0.024 ppm After0.017 ppm
3 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 56 %

11% higher than surrounding days

Temperature 47.1 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Wind 3.52 kt

About the same as surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 80 µg/m³ 3.6 Jan 1, 2001 #12 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

2 retained sources

Official record

Regulation 5 and Rule 6-3 staff report: Top 20 Bay Area PM2.5 days

Bay Area Air Quality Management District via California Air Resources Board

The Air District's official Top 20 chart identifies the Bay Area PM2.5 peak on January 1, 2001 as caused by fireworks.

What it supports

An official source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Limit

The retrospective chart gives a regional daily cause label but does not publish a monitor-level source fraction or the underlying attribution procedure on the chart page.

Official record

The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality

California Air Resources Board

CARB's source-apportionment summary for San Jose peak PM2.5 samples collected during December 2000-January 2001 identifies a mixture dominated by motor-vehicle emissions, ammonium nitrate, and wood or plant burning.

What it supports

A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Limit

The study period includes January 1, but the published summary does not isolate that single daily sample.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Officially verified A directly applicable government determination or qualified scientific attribution product identifies this cause.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.