2001-01-01 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA fireworks episode
January 1, 2001
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 77.7 µg/m³ near San Francisco across
1 covered metro home to 4.6 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 3.1 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 14 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Fireworks”
A Bay Area Air Quality Management District staff report explicitly labels January 1, 2001 as a fireworks-caused Top 20 Bay Area PM2.5 day. An exact-window National Weather Service discussion independently documents the low-level inversion and light surface winds that limited dispersion.
Officially verifiedA directly applicable government determination or qualified scientific attribution product identifies this cause.
Bay Area Air Quality Management District via California Air Resources Board · Nov 1, 2019official
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
77.7 µg/m³ near San Francisco
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 3.5 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA
Monitor comparison window 2000-12-29 to 2001-01-04 · PM2.5 target: Livermore
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse67.9 µg/m³
62% above nearby days
PM1057 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.567.9 µg/m³
62% higher than surrounding days
Before41.8 µg/m³ Event67.9 µg/m³ After39.4 µg/m³
PM1057 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Before— Event57 µg/m³ After—
Carbon monoxide1.37 ppm
11% lower than surrounding days
Before1.52 ppm Event1.37 ppm After1.53 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide25.9 ppb
12% lower than surrounding days
Before28.7 ppb Event25.9 ppb After32.1 ppb
Sulfur dioxide2.21 ppb
17% lower than surrounding days
Before2.61 ppb Event2.21 ppb After2.78 ppb
Ozone0.009 ppm
69% higher than surrounding days
Before0.005 ppm Event0.009 ppm After0.005 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity77 %
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature52.5 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
2 retained sources
Official record
Regulation 5 and Rule 6-3 staff report: Top 20 Bay Area PM2.5 days
Bay Area Air Quality Management District via California Air Resources Board
The Air District's official Top 20 chart identifies the Bay Area PM2.5 peak on January 1, 2001 as caused by fireworks.
What it supports
An official source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The retrospective chart gives a regional daily cause label but does not publish a monitor-level source fraction or the underlying attribution procedure on the chart page.
Official record
Area Forecast Discussion: low-level inversion and light winds
National Weather Service San Francisco Bay Area via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
NWS San Francisco Bay Area expected the low-level inversion to persist into New Year's Day with another clear night and light winds near sea level.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The forecast discussion documents trapping conditions but does not identify fireworks or attribute the PM2.5 measurement.
What remains uncertain
The official regional attribution supports fireworks as the event cause but does not quantify the fireworks-attributable share of the San Francisco metro daily PM2.5 value.
Status and provenance
Officially verifiedA directly applicable government determination or qualified scientific attribution product identifies this cause.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.