Prescribed fire EPA monitor flag
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 44.4 µg/m³ near Augusta across 1 covered metro home to 636,760 people.
Why we think this happened
The supplied retained evidence supports prescribed-fire smoke for this event; no supplied evidence establishes membership in a broader time-bounded episode.
EPA monitor flag EPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Dec 17, 2025 official
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IM, Prescribed Fire.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2025-12-17, identifying prescribed-fire smoke as affecting the sample. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.
Evidence path
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.
Source or mechanism
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IM, Prescribed Fire.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2025-12-17, identifying prescribed-fire smoke as affecting the sample. An informational qualifier is an official…
View supporting source ↗Air-mass movement
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Local response
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.0 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓Event autopsy
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Prescribed fire” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.
Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC
Monitor comparison window 2025-12-14 to 2025-12-20 · PM2.5 target: Augusta
268% above nearby days
22% lower than surrounding days
152% higher than surrounding days
268% higher than surrounding days
152% higher than surrounding days
45% higher than surrounding days
13% lower than surrounding days
31% higher than surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
22% lower than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Episode peak
-- cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
| Metro | Peak PM2.5 | Cigarettes, whole event | Peak day | All-time standing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC | 44.4 µg/m³ | 2.0 | Dec 17, 2025 | #14 of its top days |
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
AQS PM2.5 qualifier IM — Prescribed Fire.
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IM, Prescribed Fire.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2025-12-17, identifying prescribed-fire smoke as affecting the sample. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.
EPA monitor flag EPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.