← Event catalog

Wildfire smoke

2025-06-07 wildfire smoke episode affecting Rochester, NY, Syracuse, NY

June 7, 2025 to June 8, 2025

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 49.4 µg/m³ near Rochester across 2 covered metros home to 1.7 million people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 2.7 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 4.5 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

What happened, in the record

The supplied retained evidence supports wildfire smoke for this event; no supplied evidence establishes membership in a broader time-bounded episode.

Sequence: Rochester (Jun 7) → Syracuse (Jun 8)

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Rochester, NY 49.4 µg/m³ 4.0 Jun 7, 2025 #6 of its top days
Syracuse, NY 36.5 µg/m³ 1.7 Jun 8, 2025 #23 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

The evidence

News discovery (GDELT) 1

Status and provenance

Research preview: this record carries research-only status and its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence review completes. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula.