← Air events

Wildfire smoke Agency determination

June 3–6, 2025 Upper Midwest Canadian wildfire-smoke episode

June 3, 2025 to June 6, 2025 · Origin: Canada

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 93.5 µg/m³ near Minneapolis across 6 covered metros home to 20 million people. 2 metros placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 2.4 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 48 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Wildfire smoke”

The supplied evidence supports wildfire smoke and documents an overlapping or continuing regional occurrence across the proposed members.

Agency determination A government body issued a record naming this cause for this event: an NWS air-quality alert, a NOAA Storm Events record, or a state or local official archive.

U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jun 3, 2025 official

AQS PM2.5 qualifier IF — Fire - Canadian.

EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IF, Fire - Canadian.) on 312 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-06-03, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jun 5, 2025 official

AQS PM2.5 qualifier IF — Fire - Canadian.

EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IF, Fire - Canadian.) on 76 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-06-05, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jun 5, 2025 official

AQS PM2.5 qualifier IF — Fire - Canadian.

EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IF, Fire - Canadian.) on 20 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-06-05, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Sequence: Minneapolis (Jun 3) → Milwaukee (Jun 4) → Madison (Jun 4) → Chicago (Jun 5) → Detroit (Jun 6) → Toledo (Jun 6)

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Wildfire smoke

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IF, Fire - Canadian.) on 312 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-06-03, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official…

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    Transport into the affected region is documented

    Wisconsin DNR attributed the June 3–4 advisory to Canadian wildfire smoke moving northwest to southeast across Wisconsin.

    View transport source ↗
    Documented
  3. 3

    Local response

    93.5 µg/m³ near Minneapolis

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 6 metros. The peak daily concentration is roughly 4.3 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Wildfire smoke” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI

Monitor comparison window 2025-05-31 to 2025-06-06 · PM2.5 target: Pacific Street

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 86 µg/m³

465% above nearby days

Air movement 3.78 kt

87% higher than surrounding days

PM10 80 µg/m³

135% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 86 µg/m³

465% higher than surrounding days

Before15.2 µg/m³ Event86 µg/m³ After14.6 µg/m³
10 monitors · 1 HOUR
PM10 80 µg/m³

135% higher than surrounding days

Before30 µg/m³ Event80 µg/m³ After34 µg/m³
5 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.492 ppm

146% higher than surrounding days

Before0.192 ppm Event0.492 ppm After0.206 ppm
6 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 3.56 ppb

24% lower than surrounding days

Before4.69 ppb Event3.56 ppb After8.29 ppb
5 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 0.792 ppb

7% higher than surrounding days

Before0.806 ppb Event0.792 ppb After0.604 ppb
6 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.024 ppm

38% lower than surrounding days

Before0.044 ppm Event0.024 ppm After0.036 ppm
7 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Temperature 59.3 °F

15% lower than surrounding days

Wind 3.78 kt

87% higher than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 93.5 µg/m³ 4.3 Jun 3, 2025 #5 of its top days
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 59.4 µg/m³ 2.7 Jun 5, 2025 #21 of its top days
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI 56.3 µg/m³ 2.6 Jun 6, 2025 #20 of its top days
Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 51.2 µg/m³ 2.3 Jun 4, 2025 #14 of its top days
Madison, WI 49.8 µg/m³ 2.3 Jun 4, 2025 #12 of its top days
Toledo, OH 49.6 µg/m³ 2.3 Jun 6, 2025 #10 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

EPA AQS monitor qualifier 8

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IF — Fire - Canadian.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jun 3, 2025 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IF, Fire - Canadian.) on 312 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-06-03, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IF — Fire - Canadian.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jun 5, 2025 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IF, Fire - Canadian.) on 76 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-06-05, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IF — Fire - Canadian.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jun 5, 2025 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IF, Fire - Canadian.) on 20 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-06-05, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IF — Fire - Canadian.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jun 5, 2025 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IF, Fire - Canadian.) on 452 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-06-05, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IF — Fire - Canadian.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jun 4, 2025 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IF, Fire - Canadian.) on 45 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-06-04, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IF — Fire - Canadian.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jun 4, 2025 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IF, Fire - Canadian.) on 96 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-06-04, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IF — Fire - Canadian.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jun 4, 2025 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IF, Fire - Canadian.) on 429 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-06-04, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IF — Fire - Canadian.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jun 6, 2025 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IF, Fire - Canadian.) on 75 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-06-06, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

NWS Air Quality Alert 1

  • Southeast Michigan PM2.5 advisory due to wildfire smoke

    Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy · Jun 6, 2025 official government

    Michigan EGLE continued a June 6 fine-particle advisory for southeast Michigan and explicitly attributed elevated PM2.5 to wildfire smoke; this directly covers the Detroit member. IEM is the archive, not the official system of record.

Agency and publisher pages 3

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Agency determination A government body issued a record naming this cause for this event: an NWS air-quality alert, a NOAA Storm Events record, or a state or local official archive.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.