March 14–15, 2025 central U.S. transported-dust episode
March 14, 2025 to March 15, 2025 · Origin: Southwestern United States; Texas and Oklahoma Panhandles
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 64.7 µg/m³ near Kansas City across
2 covered metros home to 3.0 million people.
1 metro recorded their worst day on record; 2 placed a top-ten day.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.3 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 6.9 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Dust”
The supplied evidence supports dust and documents an overlapping or continuing regional occurrence across the proposed members.
EPA monitor flagEPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Mar 14, 2025official
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IJ, High Winds.) on 48 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-03-14, identifying windblown or transported dust as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.
KDHE reported that strong winds were transporting dust and smoke from Oklahoma wildfires and eastern Kansas fires into Kansas, with unhealthy to hazardous air quality possible.
Sequence: Kansas City (Mar 14) → Little Rock (Mar 15)
Evidence path
From source to city
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IJ, High Winds.) on 48 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-03-14, identifying windblown or transported dust as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official…
KDHE reported that strong winds were transporting dust and smoke from Oklahoma wildfires and eastern Kansas fires into Kansas, with unhealthy to hazardous air quality possible.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Dust” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Kansas City, MO-KS
Monitor comparison window 2025-03-11 to 2025-03-17 · PM2.5 target: HERITAGE PARK
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse56.5 µg/m³
383% above nearby days
Air movement13.8 kt
93% higher than surrounding days
PM10382 µg/m³
526% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.556.5 µg/m³
383% higher than surrounding days
Before14.1 µg/m³ Event56.5 µg/m³ After5.26 µg/m³
PM10382 µg/m³
526% higher than surrounding days
Before61 µg/m³ Event382 µg/m³ After37 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.330 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.370 ppm Event0.330 ppm After0.188 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide5.87 ppb
35% lower than surrounding days
Before16.3 ppb Event5.87 ppb After8.40 ppb
Sulfur dioxide1.23 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before1.44 ppb Event1.23 ppb After1.04 ppb
Ozone0.043 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.051 ppm Event0.043 ppm After0.036 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity37.5 %
14% lower than surrounding days
Pressure956 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature67.1 °F
9% higher than surrounding days
Wind13.8 kt
93% higher than surrounding days
Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR
Monitor comparison window 2025-03-12 to 2025-03-18 · PM2.5 target: PARR
4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse7.40 µg/m³
20% below nearby days
Air movement4.80 kt
12% lower than surrounding days
Carbon monoxide0.188 ppm
24% lower than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.57.40 µg/m³
20% lower than surrounding days
Before12.2 µg/m³ Event7.40 µg/m³ After8.40 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.188 ppm
24% lower than surrounding days
Before0.325 ppm Event0.188 ppm After0.246 ppm
Sulfur dioxide0.063 ppb
85% lower than surrounding days
Before0.571 ppb Event0.063 ppb After0.362 ppb
Ozone0.036 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.034 ppm Event0.036 ppm After0.046 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity25.5 %
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature64.4 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind4.80 kt
12% lower than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
Where the air had been
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple
arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to
assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Transport context · not source attribution
Air arriving near Kansas City
Peak-date arrivals · 2025-03-14
Broad historyMostly southwest of the metro
72-hour reach1,000–2,600 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway
Peak-date arrivals · 2025-03-15
Broad historyMostly south of the metro
72-hour reach1,200–3,250 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Mar 14, 2025officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IJ, High Winds.) on 48 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2025-03-14, identifying windblown or transported dust as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.
Kansas Department of Health and Environment · Mar 14, 2025officialgovernment
KDHE reported that strong winds were transporting dust and smoke from Oklahoma wildfires and eastern Kansas fires into Kansas, with unhealthy to hazardous air quality possible.
National Weather Service Little Rockofficialgovernment
NWS Little Rock documented dust transported from west Texas and southeast New Mexico across Arkansas on March 14–15, producing haze across the state during this event.
The supplied evidence does not identify or quantify every specific source contributing across all proposed members.
Status and provenance
EPA monitor flagEPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.