2024-07-31 dust episode affecting Austin-Round Rock, TX, San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
July 31, 2024
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 38.7 µg/m³ near San Antonio across
2 covered metros home to 5.3 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 1.3 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 7.0 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Dust”
The supplied retained evidence supports dust for this event; no supplied evidence establishes membership in a broader time-bounded episode.
EPA monitor flagEPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 31, 2024official
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (RA, African Dust.) on 24 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2024-07-31, identifying windblown or transported dust as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 31, 2024official
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (RA, African Dust.) on 24 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2024-07-31, identifying windblown or transported dust as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality · Aug 4, 2025official
TCEQ identifies Saharan Desert dust as the July 31 exceptional-event source at Travis County monitors, supporting the Austin portion of this event; it does not assess San Antonio.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (RA, African Dust.) on 24 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2024-07-31, identifying windblown or transported dust as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an…
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
38.7 µg/m³ near San Antonio
EPA monitors recorded the event across 2 metros.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 1.8 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Dust” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Monitor comparison window 2024-07-28 to 2024-08-03 · PM2.5 target: San Antonio Bulverde Parkway
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse34.5 µg/m³
247% above nearby days
Air movement8.59 kt
39% higher than surrounding days
PM10148 µg/m³
323% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.534.5 µg/m³
247% higher than surrounding days
Before9.94 µg/m³ Event34.5 µg/m³ After6.79 µg/m³
PM10148 µg/m³
323% higher than surrounding days
Before35 µg/m³ Event148 µg/m³ After22 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.133 ppm
13% higher than surrounding days
Before0.113 ppm Event0.133 ppm After0.188 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide1.70 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before1.69 ppb Event1.70 ppb After3.33 ppb
Sulfur dioxide-0.239 ppb
8% lower than surrounding days
Before-0.222 ppb Event-0.239 ppb After-0.200 ppb
Ozone0.021 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.020 ppm Event0.021 ppm After0.025 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Temperature84.8 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind8.59 kt
39% higher than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 31, 2024officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (RA, African Dust.) on 24 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2024-07-31, identifying windblown or transported dust as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 31, 2024officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (RA, African Dust.) on 24 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2024-07-31, identifying windblown or transported dust as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality · Aug 4, 2025officialgovernment
TCEQ identifies Saharan Desert dust as the July 31 exceptional-event source at Travis County monitors, supporting the Austin portion of this event; it does not assess San Antonio.
What remains uncertain
Agency-submitted AQS qualifiers do not establish EPA concurrence.
Status and provenance
EPA monitor flagEPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.