← Air events

Mixed causes EPA monitor flag

2024-01-01 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ and Tucson, AZ fireworks and winter inversion episode

January 1, 2024

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 102.8 µg/m³ near Phoenix across 2 covered metros home to 6.3 million people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 3.6 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 22 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Mixed causes”

Official evidence identifies fireworks across the Arizona metros and separately identifies an inversion trapping emissions at the West Phoenix monitor. Both are retained as material components of the episode.

EPA monitor flag EPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.

U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 1, 2024 official

AQS PM2.5 qualifier RH — Fireworks.

EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (RH, Fireworks.) on 144 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2024-01-01, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.

U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 1, 2024 official

AQS PM2.5 qualifier IH — Fireworks.

EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 10 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2024-01-01, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

Maricopa Association of Governments official

Air Quality Update meeting minutes

The regional government air-quality update identifies the West Phoenix monitor's January 1, 2024 PM2.5 episode and describes an inversion trapping emissions as a contributing condition.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Sequence: Phoenix (Jan 1) → Tucson (Jan 1)

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Mixed causes

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (RH, Fireworks.) on 144 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2024-01-01, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency…

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    102.8 µg/m³ near Phoenix

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 2 metros. The peak daily concentration is roughly 4.7 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Mixed causes” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ

Monitor comparison window 2023-12-29 to 2024-01-04 · PM2.5 target: WEST PHOENIX

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 43.7 µg/m³

290% above nearby days

Air movement 1.44 kt

About the same as surrounding days

PM10 36 µg/m³

57% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 43.7 µg/m³

290% higher than surrounding days

Before9.64 µg/m³ Event43.7 µg/m³ After11.2 µg/m³
12 monitors · 1 HOUR
PM10 36 µg/m³

57% higher than surrounding days

Before18 µg/m³ Event36 µg/m³ After23 µg/m³
32 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.600 ppm

45% higher than surrounding days

Before0.409 ppm Event0.600 ppm After0.412 ppm
7 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 22.1 ppb

16% higher than surrounding days

Before19.1 ppb Event22.1 ppb After19 ppb
6 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 0.583 ppb

34% higher than surrounding days

Before0.250 ppb Event0.583 ppb After0.435 ppb
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.019 ppm

32% lower than surrounding days

Before0.031 ppm Event0.019 ppm After0.026 ppm
26 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 64.5 %

10% higher than surrounding days

Pressure 978 Millibars

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 50.4 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Wind 1.44 kt

About the same as surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 102.8 µg/m³ 4.7 Jan 1, 2024 #7 of its top days
Tucson, AZ 25.8 µg/m³ 1.2 Jan 1, 2024 #19 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

EPA AQS monitor qualifier 2

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier RH — Fireworks.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 1, 2024 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (RH, Fireworks.) on 144 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2024-01-01, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IH — Fireworks.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 1, 2024 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 10 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2024-01-01, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

Agency and publisher pages 1

  • Air Quality Update meeting minutes

    Maricopa Association of Governments official government

    The regional government air-quality update identifies the West Phoenix monitor's January 1, 2024 PM2.5 episode and describes an inversion trapping emissions as a contributing condition.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

EPA monitor flag EPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.