2022-05-09 Colorado Springs, CO wildfire smoke and dust episode
May 9, 2022 · Origin: Four Corners; New Mexico
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 27.3 µg/m³ near Colorado Springs across
1 covered metro home to 777,634 people.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Mixed causes”
Contemporaneous evidence identifies both transported and local dust and New Mexico wildfire smoke as components of the Colorado Springs episode. The event is therefore resolved as mixed.
CorroboratedIndependent reporting agrees on the cause, with no agency determination, monitor flag, or published assessment behind it.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
27.3 µg/m³ near Colorado Springs
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 1.2 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Mixed causes” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Colorado Springs, CO
Monitor comparison window 2022-05-06 to 2022-05-12 · PM2.5 target: COLORADO SPRINGS - COLLEGE COLLEGE
4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse27.3 µg/m³
281% above nearby days
Air movement7.07 kt
15% higher than surrounding days
Carbon monoxide0.182 ppm
34% lower than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.527.3 µg/m³
281% higher than surrounding days
Before4.94 µg/m³ Event27.3 µg/m³ After7.17 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.182 ppm
34% lower than surrounding days
Before0.291 ppm Event0.182 ppm After0.274 ppm
Sulfur dioxide0.390 ppb
13% lower than surrounding days
Before0.496 ppb Event0.390 ppb After0.413 ppb
Ozone0.049 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.044 ppm Event0.049 ppm After0.047 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity18.8 %
26% lower than surrounding days
Temperature69 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind7.07 kt
15% higher than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
CorroboratedIndependent reporting agrees on the cause, with no agency determination, monitor flag, or published assessment behind it.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.