← Air events

Dust EPA monitor flag

2022-01-25 Albuquerque, NM dust episode

January 25, 2022

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 36.9 µg/m³ near Albuquerque across 1 covered metro home to 926,303 people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.4 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 1.3 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Dust”

Qualified supplied evidence supports dust as the root cause of this event. The supplied record does not establish a coherent shared occurrence with neighboring candidates, so the episode remains event-specific.

EPA monitor flag EPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.

U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 25, 2022 official

AQS PM2.5 qualifier IJ — High Winds.

EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IJ, High Winds.) on 40 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2022-01-25, identifying windblown or transported dust as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Dust

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IJ, High Winds.) on 40 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2022-01-25, identifying windblown or transported dust as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official…

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    36.9 µg/m³ near Albuquerque

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 1.7 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Dust” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Albuquerque, NM

Monitor comparison window 2022-01-22 to 2022-01-28 · PM2.5 target: SOUTH VALLEY

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 12.3 µg/m³

45% above nearby days

Air movement 5.91 kt

86% higher than surrounding days

PM10 79 µg/m³

163% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 12.3 µg/m³

45% higher than surrounding days

Before8.52 µg/m³ Event12.3 µg/m³ After8.26 µg/m³
6 monitors · 1 HOUR
PM10 79 µg/m³

163% higher than surrounding days

Before36 µg/m³ Event79 µg/m³ After29.5 µg/m³
6 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.329 ppm

38% higher than surrounding days

Before0.315 ppm Event0.329 ppm After0.211 ppm
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 12.9 ppb

6% higher than surrounding days

Before11 ppb Event12.9 ppb After12.2 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 1.18 ppb

124% higher than surrounding days

Before0.529 ppb Event1.18 ppb After0.442 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.032 ppm

26% higher than surrounding days

Before0.022 ppm Event0.032 ppm After0.026 ppm
5 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 35.6 %

20% lower than surrounding days

Pressure 836 Millibars

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 39.5 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Wind 5.91 kt

86% higher than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Albuquerque, NM 36.9 µg/m³ 1.7 Jan 25, 2022 #19 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

EPA AQS monitor qualifier 1

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IJ — High Winds.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 25, 2022 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IJ, High Winds.) on 40 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2022-01-25, identifying windblown or transported dust as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

News discovery (GDELT) 1

  • Health alert issued for Albuquerque due to blowing dust

    KOB · Christina Rodriguez · Invalid Date corroborates

    KOB reported that the Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Air Quality Program issued a January 25 health alert because of dust and warned of elevated outdoor particle levels.

Status and provenance

EPA monitor flag EPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.