2021-07-31 Spokane-Spokane Valley wildfire-smoke episode
July 31, 2021 · Origin: Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 85.9 µg/m³ near Spokane across
1 covered metro home to 604,962 people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 3.6 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 2.2 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Wildfire smoke”
Supplied qualified evidence supports wildfire-smoke as the root cause. The grouping includes only events linked by explicit shared episode evidence; otherwise this remains a single-event episode.
Agency determinationA government body issued a record naming this cause for this event: an NWS air-quality alert, a NOAA Storm Events record, or a state or local official archive.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 31, 2021official
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IT, Wildfire-U. S.) on 144 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2021-07-31, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.
An archived NWS Air Quality Alert for Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA, issued 2021-07-30T19:13Z, explicitly identifies wildfire smoke. IEM is the archive, not the official system of record.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IT, Wildfire-U. S.) on 144 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2021-07-31, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official…
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
85.9 µg/m³ near Spokane
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 3.9 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Wildfire smoke” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 31, 2021officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IT, Wildfire-U. S.) on 144 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2021-07-31, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.
National Weather Service via Iowa Environmental Mesonet archive · the following agencies: · Jul 30, 2021corroboratesgovernment
An archived NWS Air Quality Alert for Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA, issued 2021-07-30T19:13Z, explicitly identifies wildfire smoke. IEM is the archive, not the official system of record.
Spokane Regional Clean Air Agencyofficialgovernment
Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency states that wildfire smoke on July 31 and August 1 caused exceedances of the 24-hour PM2.5 health standard.
What remains uncertain
An AQS informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not an EPA-concurred exclusion determination.
The supplied evidence resolves cause but does not establish identity with another candidate episode.
Status and provenance
Agency determinationA government body issued a record naming this cause for this event: an NWS air-quality alert, a NOAA Storm Events record, or a state or local official archive.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.