2021-01-17 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land dust episode
January 17, 2021 · Origin: Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 47.4 µg/m³ near Houston across
1 covered metro home to 7.8 million people.
1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 1.6 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 12 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Dust”
Supplied qualified evidence supports dust as the root cause. The grouping includes only events linked by explicit shared episode evidence; otherwise this remains a single-event episode.
DocumentedAn agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality official
TCEQ's exceptional-event analysis documents transported windblown dust entering Harris County on January 16 and includes Houston Deer Park PM2.5 soil measurements, supporting continuity into the locally reported January 17 haze.
Contemporaneous Houston reporting identified a Texas windblown-dust plume over the city on January 17 and said small local fires may also have contributed to the haze.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
Contemporaneous Houston reporting identified a Texas windblown-dust plume over the city on January 17 and said small local fires may also have contributed to the haze.
TCEQ's exceptional-event analysis documents transported windblown dust entering Harris County on January 16 and includes Houston Deer Park PM2.5 soil measurements, supporting continuity into the locally reported January 17 haze.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Dust” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX
Monitor comparison window 2021-01-14 to 2021-01-20 · PM2.5 target: Houston East
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse31.7 µg/m³
92% above nearby days
Air movement2.64 kt
45% lower than surrounding days
Carbon monoxide0.892 ppm
265% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.531.7 µg/m³
92% higher than surrounding days
Before6.83 µg/m³ Event31.7 µg/m³ After16.5 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.892 ppm
265% higher than surrounding days
Before0.244 ppm Event0.892 ppm After0.225 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide17.6 ppb
48% higher than surrounding days
Before11.9 ppb Event17.6 ppb After10.6 ppb
Sulfur dioxide0.358 ppb
205% higher than surrounding days
Before0.117 ppb Event0.358 ppb After-0.150 ppb
Ozone0.021 ppm
16% lower than surrounding days
Before0.025 ppm Event0.021 ppm After0.026 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity28.3 °F
30% lower than surrounding days
Pressure1019 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature53.3 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind2.64 kt
45% lower than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
Texas Commission on Environmental Qualityofficialgovernment
TCEQ's exceptional-event analysis documents transported windblown dust entering Harris County on January 16 and includes Houston Deer Park PM2.5 soil measurements, supporting continuity into the locally reported January 17 haze.
KPRC 2 Click2Houston · Aaron Barker · Jan 17, 2021corroborates
Contemporaneous Houston reporting identified a Texas windblown-dust plume over the city on January 17 and said small local fires may also have contributed to the haze.
The supplied evidence resolves cause but does not establish identity with another candidate episode.
Status and provenance
DocumentedAn agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.