July 5, 2020 · Origin: Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY; Cleveland-Elyria, OH
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 61.8 µg/m³ near Cleveland across
2 covered metros home to 3.3 million people.
2 metros placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.2 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 7.5 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Fireworks”
Supplied qualified evidence supports fireworks as the root cause. The grouping includes only events linked by explicit shared episode evidence; otherwise this remains a single-event episode.
CorroboratedIndependent reporting agrees on the cause, with no agency determination, monitor flag, or published assessment behind it.
WBFO / Buffalo Toronto Public Media · Jul 5, 2020corroborates
The opened Buffalo report quotes a National Weather Service meteorologist explaining that smoke from extensive neighborhood fireworks became trapped and created early-morning haze and a burning odor. It supports fireworks for the Buffalo member but does not establish the Cleveland member or quantify PM2.5 contribution.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The opened Buffalo report quotes a National Weather Service meteorologist explaining that smoke from extensive neighborhood fireworks became trapped and created early-morning haze and a burning odor. It supports fireworks for the Buffalo member but…
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
61.8 µg/m³ near Cleveland
EPA monitors recorded the event across 2 metros.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.8 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY
Monitor comparison window 2020-07-02 to 2020-07-08 · PM2.5 target: AMHERST
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse37.7 µg/m³
226% above nearby days
Carbon monoxide0.337 ppm
63% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.537.7 µg/m³
226% higher than surrounding days
Before10.9 µg/m³ Event37.7 µg/m³ After11.6 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.337 ppm
63% higher than surrounding days
Before0.203 ppm Event0.337 ppm After0.206 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide7.61 ppb
8% higher than surrounding days
Before5.95 ppb Event7.61 ppb After7.06 ppb
Sulfur dioxide1.10 ppb
123% higher than surrounding days
Before0.494 ppb Event1.10 ppb After0.375 ppb
Ozone0.040 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.032 ppm Event0.040 ppm After0.055 ppm
Cleveland-Elyria, OH
Monitor comparison window 2020-07-02 to 2020-07-08 · PM2.5 target: Barr School
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse57.1 µg/m³
292% above nearby days
Air movement3.85 kt
9% lower than surrounding days
PM1048 µg/m³
20% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.557.1 µg/m³
292% higher than surrounding days
Before9.85 µg/m³ Event57.1 µg/m³ After14.6 µg/m³
PM1048 µg/m³
20% higher than surrounding days
Before27 µg/m³ Event48 µg/m³ After40 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.321 ppm
29% higher than surrounding days
Before0.245 ppm Event0.321 ppm After0.249 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide6.56 ppb
27% lower than surrounding days
Before8.12 ppb Event6.56 ppb After9.25 ppb
Sulfur dioxide1 ppb
6% higher than surrounding days
Before0.433 ppb Event1 ppb After0.947 ppb
Ozone0.035 ppm
26% lower than surrounding days
Before0.033 ppm Event0.035 ppm After0.050 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity52.1 %
9% lower than surrounding days
Temperature65.3 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind3.85 kt
9% lower than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
WBFO / Buffalo Toronto Public Media · Jul 5, 2020corroborates
The opened Buffalo report quotes a National Weather Service meteorologist explaining that smoke from extensive neighborhood fireworks became trapped and created early-morning haze and a burning odor. It supports fireworks for the Buffalo member but does not establish the Cleveland member or quantify PM2.5 contribution.
What remains uncertain
The supplied evidence resolves cause but does not establish identity with another candidate episode.
Status and provenance
CorroboratedIndependent reporting agrees on the cause, with no agency determination, monitor flag, or published assessment behind it.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.