January 1, 2019 · Origin: Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown metropolitan area, Texas
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 90.8 µg/m³ near Houston across
2 covered metros home to 10 million people.
2 metros placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 3.0 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 31 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Fireworks”
The official regional assessment says the Austin-area January 1 PM2.5 day was most likely due to New Year's Eve fireworks.
DocumentedAn agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.
Capital Area Council of Governments · Jul 31, 2020official
The regional annual assessment states that January 1, 2019 was the sole Austin-area PM2.5 day rated unhealthy for sensitive groups and that it was most likely due to New Year’s Eve fireworks.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The regional annual assessment states that January 1, 2019 was the sole Austin-area PM2.5 day rated unhealthy for sensitive groups and that it was most likely due to New Year’s Eve fireworks.
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
90.8 µg/m³ near Houston
EPA monitors recorded the event across 2 metros.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 4.1 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Austin-Round Rock, TX
Monitor comparison window 2018-12-29 to 2019-01-04 · PM2.5 target: Austin North Interstate 35
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse35.5 µg/m³
237% above nearby days
Air movement5.85 kt
17% higher than surrounding days
Carbon monoxide0.296 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.535.5 µg/m³
237% higher than surrounding days
Before11.4 µg/m³ Event35.5 µg/m³ After6.54 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.296 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.243 ppm Event0.296 ppm After0.400 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide4.06 ppb
31% lower than surrounding days
Before5.85 ppb Event4.06 ppb After7.17 ppb
Sulfur dioxide-0.158 ppb
45% lower than surrounding days
Before-0.109 ppb Event-0.158 ppb After-0.109 ppb
Ozone0.013 ppm
5% lower than surrounding days
Before0.014 ppm Event0.013 ppm After0.013 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Temperature41.6 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind5.85 kt
17% higher than surrounding days
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX
Monitor comparison window 2018-12-29 to 2019-01-04 · PM2.5 target: Houston East
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse50.8 µg/m³
535% above nearby days
Air movement3.68 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Carbon monoxide0.535 ppm
153% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.550.8 µg/m³
535% higher than surrounding days
Before8 µg/m³ Event50.8 µg/m³ After3.70 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.535 ppm
153% higher than surrounding days
Before0.211 ppm Event0.535 ppm After0.206 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide7.78 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before6.47 ppb Event7.78 ppb After7.72 ppb
Sulfur dioxide0.400 ppb
1943% higher than surrounding days
Before-0.022 ppb Event0.400 ppb After-0.104 ppb
Ozone0.022 ppm
82% higher than surrounding days
Before0.005 ppm Event0.022 ppm After0.012 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity46.1 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure1020 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature55 °F
10% higher than surrounding days
Wind3.68 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
Capital Area Council of Governments · Capital Area Council of Governments · Jul 31, 2020officialgovernment
The regional annual assessment states that January 1, 2019 was the sole Austin-area PM2.5 day rated unhealthy for sensitive groups and that it was most likely due to New Year’s Eve fireworks.
The supplied attribution specifically supports the Austin-area portion of this multi-place candidate; it does not separately attribute the Houston observation.
Status and provenance
DocumentedAn agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.