← Air events

Fireworks Documented

2019 Austin-area New Year's fireworks episode

January 1, 2019 · Origin: Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown metropolitan area, Texas

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 90.8 µg/m³ near Houston across 2 covered metros home to 10 million people. 2 metros placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 3.0 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 31 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Fireworks”

The official regional assessment says the Austin-area January 1 PM2.5 day was most likely due to New Year's Eve fireworks.

Documented An agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Sequence: Houston (Jan 1) → Austin (Jan 1)

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Fireworks

    The regional annual assessment states that January 1, 2019 was the sole Austin-area PM2.5 day rated unhealthy for sensitive groups and that it was most likely due to New Year’s Eve fireworks.

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    90.8 µg/m³ near Houston

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 2 metros. The peak daily concentration is roughly 4.1 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Austin-Round Rock, TX

Monitor comparison window 2018-12-29 to 2019-01-04 · PM2.5 target: Austin North Interstate 35

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 35.5 µg/m³

237% above nearby days

Air movement 5.85 kt

17% higher than surrounding days

Carbon monoxide 0.296 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 35.5 µg/m³

237% higher than surrounding days

Before11.4 µg/m³ Event35.5 µg/m³ After6.54 µg/m³
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 0.296 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.243 ppm Event0.296 ppm After0.400 ppm
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 4.06 ppb

31% lower than surrounding days

Before5.85 ppb Event4.06 ppb After7.17 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide -0.158 ppb

45% lower than surrounding days

Before-0.109 ppb Event-0.158 ppb After-0.109 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.013 ppm

5% lower than surrounding days

Before0.014 ppm Event0.013 ppm After0.013 ppm
2 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Temperature 41.6 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Wind 5.85 kt

17% higher than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 90.8 µg/m³ 4.1 Jan 1, 2019 #3 of its top days
Austin-Round Rock, TX 41 µg/m³ 1.9 Jan 1, 2019 #10 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

Agency and publisher pages 1

Cited authorities: Capital Area Council of Governments

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Documented An agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.