2005-07-05 fireworks episode affecting Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
July 5, 2005
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 79.8 µg/m³ near Riverside across
1 covered metro home to 4.7 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.9 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 14 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Fireworks”
Qualified frozen evidence supports fireworks as the broad root cause.
DocumentedAn agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.
South Coast Air Quality Management District official
The District's later exceptional-event assessment reports that PM2.5 potassium measurements at South Coast basin stations on July 5, 2005, including Riverside-Rubidoux, were attributable to fireworks. This supports fireworks as a contributor to the July 5, 2005 Riverside-area PM2.5 event.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The District's later exceptional-event assessment reports that PM2.5 potassium measurements at South Coast basin stations on July 5, 2005, including Riverside-Rubidoux, were attributable to fireworks. This supports fireworks as a contributor to the…
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
79.8 µg/m³ near Riverside
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 3.6 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
Monitor comparison window 2005-07-02 to 2005-07-08 · PM2.5 target: Rubidoux
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse79.8 µg/m³
211% above nearby days
Air movement3.90 kt
About the same as surrounding days
PM1033.5 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.579.8 µg/m³
211% higher than surrounding days
Before28.1 µg/m³ Event79.8 µg/m³ After22 µg/m³
PM1033.5 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Before26 µg/m³ Event33.5 µg/m³ After32.5 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.324 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.250 ppm Event0.324 ppm After0.338 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide14.9 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before11.5 ppb Event14.9 ppb After15.7 ppb
Sulfur dioxide1.76 ppb
31% higher than surrounding days
Before1.54 ppb Event1.76 ppb After1.33 ppb
Ozone0.061 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.062 ppm Event0.061 ppm After0.062 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity43.3 %
15% lower than surrounding days
Pressure906 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature78.4 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind3.90 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
South Coast Air Quality Management Districtofficialgovernment
The District's later exceptional-event assessment reports that PM2.5 potassium measurements at South Coast basin stations on July 5, 2005, including Riverside-Rubidoux, were attributable to fireworks. This supports fireworks as a contributor to the July 5, 2005 Riverside-area PM2.5 event.
Status and provenance
DocumentedAn agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.