2004-07-05 fireworks episode affecting Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
July 5, 2004
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 93.4 µg/m³ near Riverside across
2 covered metros home to 18 million people.
1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.9 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 52 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Fireworks”
Qualified frozen evidence supports fireworks as the broad root cause.
EPA monitor flagEPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 5, 2004official
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 2 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2004-07-05, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 5, 2004official
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 2 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2004-07-05, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 2 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2004-07-05, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag,…
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
93.4 µg/m³ near Riverside
EPA monitors recorded the event across 2 metros.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 4.2 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
Monitor comparison window 2004-07-02 to 2004-07-08 · PM2.5 target: Azusa
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse31.4 µg/m³
104% above nearby days
Air movement2.97 kt
About the same as surrounding days
PM1028 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.531.4 µg/m³
104% higher than surrounding days
Before13.2 µg/m³ Event31.4 µg/m³ After15.4 µg/m³
PM1028 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Before29 µg/m³ Event28 µg/m³ After27 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.304 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.313 ppm Event0.304 ppm After0.339 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide14.7 ppb
17% lower than surrounding days
Before14.4 ppb Event14.7 ppb After17.9 ppb
Sulfur dioxide1.74 ppb
17% lower than surrounding days
Before2.22 ppb Event1.74 ppb After2 ppb
Ozone0.043 ppm
33% higher than surrounding days
Before0.041 ppm Event0.043 ppm After0.024 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity71.8 %
6% lower than surrounding days
Pressure29.6 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature71.7 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind2.97 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
Monitor comparison window 2004-07-02 to 2004-07-08 · PM2.5 target: Fontana
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse64 µg/m³
116% above nearby days
Air movement3.57 kt
About the same as surrounding days
PM1028 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.564 µg/m³
116% higher than surrounding days
Before29.6 µg/m³ Event64 µg/m³ After24.7 µg/m³
PM1028 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Before28.5 µg/m³ Event28 µg/m³ After30 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.261 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.272 ppm Event0.261 ppm After0.226 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide11.3 ppb
34% lower than surrounding days
Before14.4 ppb Event11.3 ppb After19.9 ppb
Sulfur dioxide0.870 ppb
11% higher than surrounding days
Before1 ppb Event0.870 ppb After0.739 ppb
Ozone0.069 ppm
24% higher than surrounding days
Before0.064 ppm Event0.069 ppm After0.047 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity64.3 %
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure908 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature78.4 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind3.57 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 5, 2004officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 2 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2004-07-05, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 5, 2004officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 2 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2004-07-05, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.
What remains uncertain
AQS qualifiers are submitting-agency causal flags and do not by themselves establish EPA concurrence.
Status and provenance
EPA monitor flagEPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.