← Air events

Winter inversion Documented

2004-01-15 winter inversion episode affecting Provo-Orem, UT, Ogden-Clearfield, UT

January 15, 2004 to January 16, 2004

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 82.1 µg/m³ near Provo across 2 covered metros home to 1.4 million people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 4.6 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 6.6 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Winter inversion”

Qualified frozen evidence supports winter inversion as the broad root cause.

Documented An agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency official

Analyses of Individual Nonattainment Area

EPA's technical-support analysis identifies a strong inversion across northern Utah during January 1–17, 2004. The event's January 15–16 timing and Wasatch Front locations fall within that documented episode; the assessment describes inversion-driven PM2.5 buildup rather than a single emissions source.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Sequence: Provo (Jan 15) → Ogden (Jan 16)

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Winter inversion

    EPA's technical-support analysis identifies a strong inversion across northern Utah during January 1–17, 2004. The event's January 15–16 timing and Wasatch Front locations fall within that documented episode; the assessment describes…

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    82.1 µg/m³ near Provo

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 2 metros. The peak daily concentration is roughly 3.7 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Winter inversion” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Provo-Orem, UT

Monitor comparison window 2004-01-12 to 2004-01-19 · PM2.5 target: Spanish Fork

4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 78 µg/m³

30% above nearby days

PM10 91.3 µg/m³

36% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 78 µg/m³

30% higher than surrounding days

Before58.2 µg/m³ Event78 µg/m³ After51 µg/m³
4 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 91.3 µg/m³

36% higher than surrounding days

Before65 µg/m³ Event91.3 µg/m³ After54 µg/m³
2 monitors · 24 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 1.79 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before1.74 ppm Event1.79 ppm After1.10 ppm
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 66.8 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before64.1 ppb Event66.8 ppb After38.9 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Provo-Orem, UT 82.1 µg/m³ 7.2 Jan 16, 2004 #10 of its top days
Ogden-Clearfield, UT 62.5 µg/m³ 2.8 Jan 16, 2004 #16 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

Agency and publisher pages 1

  • Analyses of Individual Nonattainment Area

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency official government

    EPA's technical-support analysis identifies a strong inversion across northern Utah during January 1–17, 2004. The event's January 15–16 timing and Wasatch Front locations fall within that documented episode; the assessment describes inversion-driven PM2.5 buildup rather than a single emissions source.

Status and provenance

Documented An agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.