Daily PM2.5 peaked at 49.8 µg/m³ near Greenville across
4 covered metros home to 5.6 million people.
3 metros placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.4 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 13 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Wildfire smoke”
Qualified frozen evidence supports wildfire smoke as the broad root cause.
EPA monitor flagEPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 18, 2002official
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2002-07-18, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the sample. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 18, 2002official
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2002-07-18, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the sample. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 17, 2002official
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2002-07-17, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the sample. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
Sequence: Greenville (Jul 17) → Charlotte (Jul 17) → Charleston (Jul 17) → Columbia (Jul 17)
Evidence path
From source to city
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2002-07-18, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the sample. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official…
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Wildfire smoke” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Monitor comparison window 2002-07-14 to 2002-07-21 · PM2.5 target: Garinger High School
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse45 µg/m³
101% above nearby days
Air movement1.08 kt
25% lower than surrounding days
Carbon monoxide0.626 ppm
42% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.545 µg/m³
101% higher than surrounding days
Before18.9 µg/m³ Event45 µg/m³ After14.6 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.626 ppm
42% higher than surrounding days
Before0.371 ppm Event0.626 ppm After0.435 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide28.1 ppb
37% higher than surrounding days
Before12.5 ppb Event28.1 ppb After19.8 ppb
Sulfur dioxide6.63 ppb
78% higher than surrounding days
Before3.79 ppb Event6.63 ppb After3.33 ppb
Ozone0.061 ppm
16% higher than surrounding days
Before0.042 ppm Event0.061 ppm After0.048 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity66.2 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure991 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature83.1 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind1.08 kt
25% lower than surrounding days
Columbia, SC
Monitor comparison window 2002-07-14 to 2002-07-21 · PM2.5 target: BATES HOUSE
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse40.3 µg/m³
133% above nearby days
Air movement3.96 kt
About the same as surrounding days
PM1082.5 µg/m³
99% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.540.3 µg/m³
133% higher than surrounding days
Before16.8 µg/m³ Event40.3 µg/m³ After15.5 µg/m³
PM1082.5 µg/m³
99% higher than surrounding days
Before53 µg/m³ Event82.5 µg/m³ After29 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.783 ppm
27% higher than surrounding days
Before0.870 ppm Event0.783 ppm After0.404 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide11.3 ppb
72% higher than surrounding days
Before7.60 ppb Event11.3 ppb After5.13 ppb
Sulfur dioxide3.17 ppb
43% higher than surrounding days
Before1.88 ppb Event3.17 ppb After2.23 ppb
Ozone0.049 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.036 ppm Event0.049 ppm After0.053 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Wind3.96 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC
Monitor comparison window 2002-07-14 to 2002-07-21 · PM2.5 target: TAYLORS
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse39.1 µg/m³
86% above nearby days
PM1046 µg/m³
96% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.539.1 µg/m³
86% higher than surrounding days
Before19.6 µg/m³ Event39.1 µg/m³ After11.9 µg/m³
PM1046 µg/m³
96% higher than surrounding days
Before23 µg/m³ Event46 µg/m³ After18 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.308 ppm
6% lower than surrounding days
Before0.342 ppm Event0.308 ppm After0.242 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide12 ppb
19% higher than surrounding days
Before10.1 ppb Event12 ppb After9.29 ppb
Sulfur dioxide4.08 ppb
56% higher than surrounding days
Before5.23 ppb Event4.08 ppb After1.63 ppb
Ozone0.042 ppm
17% lower than surrounding days
Before0.040 ppm Event0.042 ppm After0.053 ppm
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
Where the air had been
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple
arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to
assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Transport context · not source attribution
Air arriving near Charleston-North Charleston
Peak-date arrivals · 2002-07-17
Broad historyMostly northwest of the metro
72-hour reach350–850 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
Peak-date arrivals · 2002-07-17
Broad historyMostly northwest of the metro
72-hour reach350–1,150 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Columbia
Peak-date arrivals · 2002-07-17
Broad historyMostly north of the metro
72-hour reach350–850 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin
Peak-date arrivals · 2002-07-17
Broad historyMostly north of the metro
72-hour reach350–700 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 18, 2002officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2002-07-18, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the sample. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 18, 2002officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2002-07-18, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the sample. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 17, 2002officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2002-07-17, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the sample. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 18, 2002officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 2 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2002-07-18, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 17, 2002officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2002-07-17, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the sample. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jul 17, 2002officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 2 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2002-07-17, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
What remains uncertain
AQS qualifiers are submitting-agency causal flags and do not by themselves establish EPA concurrence.
Status and provenance
EPA monitor flagEPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.