← Air events

Dust Agency determination

2002-07-10 transported or windblown dust episode affecting Tucson, AZ

July 10, 2002

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 27.6 µg/m³ near Tucson across 1 covered metro home to 1.1 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.0 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 1.1 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Dust”

Qualified frozen evidence supports transported or windblown dust as the broad root cause.

Agency determination A government body issued a record naming this cause for this event: an NWS air-quality alert, a NOAA Storm Events record, or a state or local official archive.

NOAA/NCEI Storm Events Database corroborates

July 2002 Tucson dust storm

NOAA records a thunderstorm-outflow dust storm over Tucson on July 9 with near-zero visibility. It is within the collector's one-day temporal allowance and corroborates a nearby dust episode, but it does not quantify dust contribution to PM2.5 on July 10.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Source not directly documented

    The catalog has a grouping hypothesis, but no retained source directly establishes the proposed cause.

    Open question
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The 72-hour air-mass history is reconstructed

    NOAA HYSPLIT modeled 12 backward paths across multiple arrival times and heights. They show where the air traveled, not which source polluted it.

    Explore the modeled paths ↓
    Modeled
  3. 3

    Local response

    27.6 µg/m³ near Tucson

    NOAA records a thunderstorm-outflow dust storm over Tucson on July 9 with near-zero visibility. It is within the collector's one-day temporal allowance and corroborates a nearby dust episode, but it does not quantify dust contribution to PM2.5 on…

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Dust” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Tucson, AZ

Monitor comparison window 2002-07-07 to 2002-07-13 · PM2.5 target: Saguaro West

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 26.9 µg/m³

206% above nearby days

PM10 200 µg/m³

371% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 26.9 µg/m³

206% higher than surrounding days

Before7.20 µg/m³ Event26.9 µg/m³ After8.80 µg/m³
2 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 200 µg/m³

371% higher than surrounding days

Before52 µg/m³ Event200 µg/m³ After33.5 µg/m³
10 monitors · 24 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 0.468 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.494 ppm Event0.468 ppm After0.475 ppm
4 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 11.5 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before10.6 ppb Event11.5 ppb After11.1 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 0.696 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.667 ppb Event0.696 ppb After0.625 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.055 ppm

7% higher than surrounding days

Before0.042 ppm Event0.055 ppm After0.055 ppm
6 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 31.2 %

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 91.6 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Air-mass reconstruction

Where the air had been

NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.

Transport context · not source attribution

Air arriving near Tucson

Peak-date arrivals · 2002-07-10

Broad history Mostly south of the metro
72-hour reach 550–950 km
Sensitivity runs 12 modeled paths
Arrival metro
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m

Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions. A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Tucson, AZ 27.6 µg/m³ 1.3 Jul 10, 2002 #14 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

Official records

  • NOAA Storm Events Dust Storm, ARIZONA, Jul 9, 2002 "A dust storm began over the southeast side of Tucson as a result of a collapsing thunderstorm and a outflow boundary from a previous storm. The dust cloud moved over Davis Monthan AFB with visibilities reducing to near …" record →

NOAA Storm Events 1

  • July 2002 Tucson dust storm

    NOAA/NCEI Storm Events Database corroborates government

    NOAA records a thunderstorm-outflow dust storm over Tucson on July 9 with near-zero visibility. It is within the collector's one-day temporal allowance and corroborates a nearby dust episode, but it does not quantify dust contribution to PM2.5 on July 10.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Agency determination A government body issued a record naming this cause for this event: an NWS air-quality alert, a NOAA Storm Events record, or a state or local official archive.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.