2002-02-06 winter inversion episode affecting Salt Lake City, UT, Ogden-Clearfield, UT
February 6, 2002 to February 7, 2002
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 100.2 µg/m³ near Ogden across
2 covered metros home to 2.0 million people.
1 metro recorded their worst day on record; 2 placed a top-ten day.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 6.2 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 12 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Winter inversion”
Qualified frozen evidence supports winter inversion as the broad root cause.
CorroboratedIndependent reporting agrees on the cause, with no agency determination, monitor flag, or published assessment behind it.
Contemporaneous reporting says a warm-air lid was trapping cold air and pollution across the Wasatch Front; Utah air officials imposed red no-burn days in Salt Lake and Davis counties and a yellow day in Weber County during the event window.
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association · Dec 1, 2005corroborates
The study's 2002 Winter Olympic monitoring discussion identifies February 7 as a time of strong inversion, corroborating an inversion condition during this Salt Lake City–Ogden event; it does not apportion emissions sources.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
Contemporaneous reporting says a warm-air lid was trapping cold air and pollution across the Wasatch Front; Utah air officials imposed red no-burn days in Salt Lake and Davis counties and a yellow day in Weber County during the event window.
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
100.2 µg/m³ near Ogden
The study's 2002 Winter Olympic monitoring discussion identifies February 7 as a time of strong inversion, corroborating an inversion condition during this Salt Lake City–Ogden event; it does not apportion emissions sources.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Winter inversion” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Salt Lake City, UT
Monitor comparison window 2002-02-03 to 2002-02-10 · PM2.5 target: UTM COORDINATES = INLET PROBE LOCATION ON ROOF OF TRAILER
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse85.1 µg/m³
48% above nearby days
PM10120 µg/m³
54% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.585.1 µg/m³
48% higher than surrounding days
Before61 µg/m³ Event85.1 µg/m³ After8.10 µg/m³
PM10120 µg/m³
54% higher than surrounding days
Before78.5 µg/m³ Event120 µg/m³ After33.5 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.54 ppm
14% higher than surrounding days
Before1.51 ppm Event1.54 ppm After0.692 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide69.1 ppb
28% higher than surrounding days
Before54.6 ppb Event69.1 ppb After24.7 ppb
Sulfur dioxide4.13 ppb
29% higher than surrounding days
Before3.42 ppb Event4.13 ppb After2.17 ppb
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity94 %
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature19.8 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Ogden-Clearfield, UT
Monitor comparison window 2002-02-03 to 2002-02-10 · PM2.5 target: Ogden
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse83.4 µg/m³
48% above nearby days
PM10120 µg/m³
73% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.583.4 µg/m³
48% higher than surrounding days
Before56.5 µg/m³ Event83.4 µg/m³ After21.2 µg/m³
PM10120 µg/m³
73% higher than surrounding days
Before79 µg/m³ Event120 µg/m³ After34 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.41 ppm
31% higher than surrounding days
Before1.16 ppm Event1.41 ppm After0.746 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide71.1 ppb
30% higher than surrounding days
Before56.6 ppb Event71.1 ppb After30.9 ppb
Sulfur dioxide7.63 ppb
51% higher than surrounding days
Before5.46 ppb Event7.63 ppb After1.46 ppb
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Temperature17.9 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
News report
How many days of haze?
Deseret News
Contemporaneous reporting says a warm-air lid was trapping cold air and pollution across the Wasatch Front; Utah air officials imposed red no-burn days in Salt Lake and Davis counties and a yellow day in Weber County during the event window.
What it supports
A retained source supports the event interpretation for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The article identifies the accumulation mechanism but does not apportion the trapped particulate mass among individual emissions sources.
What remains uncertain
The evidence supports regional influence or transport but does not quantify the contribution to observed PM2.5.
Status and provenance
CorroboratedIndependent reporting agrees on the cause, with no agency determination, monitor flag, or published assessment behind it.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.