Maryland–Mid-Atlantic 12–15 January stagnation and inversion episode
January 12, 2001 to January 15, 2001 · Origin: Maryland–Mid-Atlantic
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 70.5 µg/m³ near Allentown across
4 covered metros home to 4.9 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.3 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 12 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Winter inversion”
Maryland’s retrospective analysis identifies the 12–15 January episode, including Baltimore, with stagnation and a strong morning inversion, plus a nitrate-rich local component.
DocumentedAn agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.
Maryland’s retrospective episode analysis reports regionwide PM2.5 enhancement on 13 January 2001 and a 12–15 January episode with westerly transport, recirculation, high humidity, stagnation, and a strong morning inversion. It identifies a nitrate-rich local-scale component associated with motor-vehicle and home-heating emissions for the Maryland portion, including Baltimore.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
Maryland’s retrospective episode analysis reports regionwide PM2.5 enhancement on 13 January 2001 and a 12–15 January episode with westerly transport, recirculation, high humidity, stagnation, and a strong morning inversion. It identifies a…
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
70.5 µg/m³ near Allentown
EPA monitors recorded the event across 4 metros.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 3.2 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Winter inversion” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
Monitor comparison window 2001-01-10 to 2001-01-18
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse42.9 µg/m³
38% above nearby days
PM1043.5 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.542.9 µg/m³
38% higher than surrounding days
Before11.6 µg/m³ Event42.9 µg/m³ After22.5 µg/m³
PM1043.5 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Before— Event43.5 µg/m³ After—
Carbon monoxide1.57 ppm
93% higher than surrounding days
Before0.817 ppm Event1.57 ppm After0.600 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide24.3 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before24.4 ppb Event24.3 ppb After20.9 ppb
Sulfur dioxide8.71 ppb
7% lower than surrounding days
Before11.2 ppb Event8.71 ppb After8.96 ppb
Ozone0.009 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.009 ppm Event0.009 ppm After0.007 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity83.7 %
8% higher than surrounding days
Pressure1025 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature39.8 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ
Monitor comparison window 2001-01-10 to 2001-01-18 · PM2.5 target: Allentown
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse42.5 µg/m³
71% above nearby days
PM1046 µg/m³
70% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.542.5 µg/m³
71% higher than surrounding days
Before19.5 µg/m³ Event42.5 µg/m³ After19.2 µg/m³
PM1046 µg/m³
70% higher than surrounding days
Before27 µg/m³ Event46 µg/m³ After18 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.27 ppm
104% higher than surrounding days
Before0.599 ppm Event1.27 ppm After0.183 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide40.8 ppb
39% higher than surrounding days
Before29.3 ppb Event40.8 ppb After23.6 ppb
Sulfur dioxide22.6 ppb
73% higher than surrounding days
Before13.1 ppb Event22.6 ppb After9.04 ppb
Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA
Monitor comparison window 2001-01-10 to 2001-01-18 · PM2.5 target: LAT/LON POINT=LOCATION OF PM-2.5 MONITOR INLET
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse47.7 µg/m³
57% above nearby days
PM1038 µg/m³
65% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.547.7 µg/m³
57% higher than surrounding days
Before14.9 µg/m³ Event47.7 µg/m³ After19.3 µg/m³
PM1038 µg/m³
65% higher than surrounding days
Before21 µg/m³ Event38 µg/m³ After19 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.32 ppm
21% higher than surrounding days
Before1.25 ppm Event1.32 ppm After0.938 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide23.8 ppb
12% higher than surrounding days
Before21.3 ppb Event23.8 ppb After16.2 ppb
Sulfur dioxide5.58 ppb
28% lower than surrounding days
Before10.6 ppb Event5.58 ppb After7.69 ppb
Scranton--Wilkes-Barre--Hazleton, PA
Monitor comparison window 2001-01-10 to 2001-01-18 · PM2.5 target: Wilkes-Barre
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse38.6 µg/m³
99% above nearby days
PM1035 µg/m³
67% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.538.6 µg/m³
99% higher than surrounding days
Before19.4 µg/m³ Event38.6 µg/m³ After13.1 µg/m³
PM1035 µg/m³
67% higher than surrounding days
Before21 µg/m³ Event35 µg/m³ After12 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.23 ppm
81% higher than surrounding days
Before0.675 ppm Event1.23 ppm After0.471 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide35.7 ppb
57% higher than surrounding days
Before21.9 ppb Event35.7 ppb After18.5 ppb
Sulfur dioxide19.8 ppb
60% higher than surrounding days
Before7.90 ppb Event19.8 ppb After10.6 ppb
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
Maryland Department of the Environmentofficialgovernment
Maryland’s retrospective episode analysis reports regionwide PM2.5 enhancement on 13 January 2001 and a 12–15 January episode with westerly transport, recirculation, high humidity, stagnation, and a strong morning inversion. It identifies a nitrate-rich local-scale component associated with motor-vehicle and home-heating emissions for the Maryland portion, including Baltimore.
What remains uncertain
The finding specifically attributes the Maryland portion; supplied evidence does not establish a common source occurrence with the Ohio candidate.
Status and provenance
DocumentedAn agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.