Other Corroborated
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 53.4 µg/m³ near Baltimore across 3 covered metros home to 11 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 2.1 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 23 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The supplied study identifies an 8–9 August Eastern Seaboard pollution episode with extensive aerosol loading and frontal-system recirculation affecting the candidate’s region.
Corroborated Independent reporting agrees on the cause, with no agency determination, monitor flag, or published assessment behind it.
ResearchGate · May 1, 2002 corroborates
Reports an 8–9 August 2001 Eastern Seaboard pollution episode with extensive aerosol loading, characterized by recirculation associated with a frontal system; supports regional transport/recirculation context for the Virginia Beach–Baltimore–Washington event, but does not apportion a specific PM2.5 source.
See every retained source and limitation ↓
Sequence: Virginia Beach (Aug 8) → Baltimore (Aug 9) → Washington (Aug 9)
Evidence path
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.
Source or mechanism
The catalog has a grouping hypothesis, but no retained source directly establishes the proposed cause.
Air-mass movement
Reports an 8–9 August 2001 Eastern Seaboard pollution episode with extensive aerosol loading, characterized by recirculation associated with a frontal system; supports regional transport/recirculation context for the Virginia…
View transport source ↗Local response
EPA monitors recorded the event across 3 metros. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.4 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓Event autopsy
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Other” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC
Monitor comparison window 2001-08-05 to 2001-08-12 · PM2.5 target: ON NEWPORT NEWS SCHOOL MAINTENANCE FACILITY
97% above nearby days
28% higher than surrounding days
97% higher than surrounding days
28% higher than surrounding days
22% higher than surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
17% higher than surrounding days
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
Monitor comparison window 2001-08-05 to 2001-08-12 · PM2.5 target: Essex
23% above nearby days
About the same as surrounding days
23% higher than surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
7% higher than surrounding days
29% higher than surrounding days
18% higher than surrounding days
11% lower than surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
Monitor comparison window 2001-08-05 to 2001-08-12 · PM2.5 target: MCMILLAN NCore-PAMS
22% above nearby days
About the same as surrounding days
22% higher than surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
30% higher than surrounding days
34% higher than surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
5% higher than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Episode peak
-- cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Views from the selected metro
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
| Metro | Peak PM2.5 | Cigarettes, whole event | Peak day | All-time standing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD | 53.4 µg/m³ | 2.4 | Aug 9, 2001 | #16 of its top days |
| Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV | 50.5 µg/m³ | 2.3 | Aug 9, 2001 | #25 of its top days |
| Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC | 50 µg/m³ | 4.2 | Aug 8, 2001 | #13 of its top days |
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
Reports an 8–9 August 2001 Eastern Seaboard pollution episode with extensive aerosol loading, characterized by recirculation associated with a frontal system; supports regional transport/recirculation context for the Virginia Beach–Baltimore–Washington event, but does not apportion a specific PM2.5 source.
Corroborated Independent reporting agrees on the cause, with no agency determination, monitor flag, or published assessment behind it.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.