Daily PM2.5 peaked at 57 µg/m³ near Knoxville across
4 covered metros home to 9.0 million people.
1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.0 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 18 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Wildfire smoke”
Qualified frozen causal evidence supports wildfire smoke as the broad root cause.
EPA monitor flagEPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Oct 27, 2000official
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 3 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2000-10-27, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 3 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2000-10-27, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official…
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Wildfire smoke” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC
Monitor comparison window 2000-10-23 to 2000-10-30 · PM2.5 target: TAYLORS
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse39.6 µg/m³
29% above nearby days
PM1050 µg/m³
9% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.539.6 µg/m³
29% higher than surrounding days
Before31 µg/m³ Event39.6 µg/m³ After15.7 µg/m³
PM1050 µg/m³
9% higher than surrounding days
Before50 µg/m³ Event50 µg/m³ After29 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.708 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.829 ppm Event0.708 ppm After0.683 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide21.8 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before28.2 ppb Event21.8 ppb After20.3 ppb
Sulfur dioxide6.05 ppb
71% higher than surrounding days
Before3.58 ppb Event6.05 ppb After2.29 ppb
Ozone0.036 ppm
8% higher than surrounding days
Before0.033 ppm Event0.036 ppm After0.029 ppm
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
Monitor comparison window 2000-10-23 to 2000-10-30
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse42.7 µg/m³
14% above nearby days
PM1072 µg/m³
13% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.542.7 µg/m³
14% higher than surrounding days
Before39.5 µg/m³ Event42.7 µg/m³ After28.9 µg/m³
PM1072 µg/m³
13% higher than surrounding days
Before66 µg/m³ Event72 µg/m³ After61 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.912 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.923 ppm Event0.912 ppm After0.735 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide26.7 ppb
11% higher than surrounding days
Before25 ppb Event26.7 ppb After23.1 ppb
Sulfur dioxide2.61 ppb
32% lower than surrounding days
Before3.83 ppb Event2.61 ppb After4.29 ppb
Ozone0.034 ppm
8% higher than surrounding days
Before0.035 ppm Event0.034 ppm After0.023 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity77.4 %
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure989 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature66 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Chattanooga, TN-GA
Monitor comparison window 2000-10-23 to 2000-10-30 · PM2.5 target: EAST RIDGE CITY HALL
3 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse48.5 µg/m³
3% above nearby days
PM1065 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.548.5 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Before47 µg/m³ Event48.5 µg/m³ After18.9 µg/m³
PM1065 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Before— Event65 µg/m³ After—
Ozone0.036 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.039 ppm Event0.036 ppm After0.032 ppm
Knoxville, TN
Monitor comparison window 2000-10-23 to 2000-10-30 · PM2.5 target: Rule High School (relo)
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse46.3 µg/m³
9% above nearby days
Air movement2.11 kt
About the same as surrounding days
PM1048.5 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.546.3 µg/m³
9% higher than surrounding days
Before45.1 µg/m³ Event46.3 µg/m³ After14.7 µg/m³
PM1048.5 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Before48 µg/m³ Event48.5 µg/m³ After16 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.15 ppm
17% higher than surrounding days
Before1.07 ppm Event1.15 ppm After0.529 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide15.2 ppb
9% lower than surrounding days
Before18.3 ppb Event15.2 ppb After12.1 ppb
Sulfur dioxide2.22 ppb
16% lower than surrounding days
Before2.79 ppb Event2.22 ppb After2.21 ppb
Ozone0.031 ppm
7% higher than surrounding days
Before0.030 ppm Event0.031 ppm After0.025 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity84.9 %
7% higher than surrounding days
Temperature59.7 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind2.11 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
Where the air had been
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple
arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to
assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Transport context · not source attribution
Air arriving near Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
Peak-date arrivals · 2000-10-27
Broad historyMostly northeast of the metro
72-hour reach500–850 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Chattanooga
Peak-date arrivals · 2000-10-27
Broad historyMostly northeast of the metro
72-hour reach200–400 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin
Peak-date arrivals · 2000-10-26
Broad historyMostly northeast of the metro
72-hour reach300–850 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Knoxville
Peak-date arrivals · 2000-10-27
Broad historySeveral approach directions
72-hour reach100–500 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Oct 27, 2000officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted request-exclusion qualifier (E, Forest Fire.) on 3 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2000-10-27, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. A request-exclusion qualifier is an official submitting-agency causal claim, but this endpoint does not establish EPA concurrence.
What remains uncertain
AQS qualifiers are submitting-agency causal flags and do not by themselves establish EPA concurrence.
Status and provenance
EPA monitor flagEPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.