1999-08-26 wildfire smoke episode affecting Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade, CA
August 26, 1999
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 108 µg/m³ near Sacramento across
1 covered metro home to 2.5 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 4.5 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 11 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Wildfire smoke”
Qualified frozen evidence supports wildfire smoke as the broad root cause.
CorroboratedIndependent reporting agrees on the cause, with no agency determination, monitor flag, or published assessment behind it.
Contemporaneous reporting states that smoke from hundreds of Northern California wildfires raised Sacramento fine-particle readings on 26 August, with an atmospheric-pressure layer retaining smoke in the Central Valley.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
Contemporaneous reporting states that smoke from hundreds of Northern California wildfires raised Sacramento fine-particle readings on 26 August, with an atmospheric-pressure layer retaining smoke in the Central Valley.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Wildfire smoke” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade, CA
Monitor comparison window 1999-08-23 to 1999-08-29 · PM2.5 target: Sacramento-1309 T Street
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse108 µg/m³
575% above nearby days
Air movement3.48 kt
About the same as surrounding days
PM10124 µg/m³
328% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5108 µg/m³
575% higher than surrounding days
Before16 µg/m³ Event108 µg/m³ After12 µg/m³
PM10124 µg/m³
328% higher than surrounding days
Before35 µg/m³ Event124 µg/m³ After21.5 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.06 ppm
145% higher than surrounding days
Before0.565 ppm Event1.06 ppm After0.356 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide26.1 ppb
59% higher than surrounding days
Before18.5 ppb Event26.1 ppb After12.4 ppb
Sulfur dioxide5.09 ppb
43% higher than surrounding days
Before3.52 ppb Event5.09 ppb After3.57 ppb
Ozone0.057 ppm
23% higher than surrounding days
Before0.046 ppm Event0.057 ppm After0.043 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity45.3 %
6% lower than surrounding days
Pressure1005 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature82.1 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind3.48 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
Where the air had been
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple
arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to
assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Transport context · not source attribution
Air arriving near Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-08-26
Broad historyMostly south of the metro
72-hour reach50–500 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
Los Angeles Times · Eric Bailey and Armando Acuna · Aug 27, 1999corroborates
Contemporaneous reporting states that smoke from hundreds of Northern California wildfires raised Sacramento fine-particle readings on 26 August, with an atmospheric-pressure layer retaining smoke in the Central Valley.
Status and provenance
CorroboratedIndependent reporting agrees on the cause, with no agency determination, monitor flag, or published assessment behind it.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.